Linking Economic Freedom and Moral Obedience

Most Americans vote according to economic considerations and not such social issues as protecting the unborn and marriage. The famous 1992 campaign slogan “It’s the economy, stupid!” still accurately describes most Americans’ voting habits.

However, what most Americans fail to realize is that economic freedom is directly linked to moral obedience. Indeed, economic freedom is impossible without moral obedience because a moral system supports every economic system.

What many people consider to be freedom – license – is in reality moral slavery. The modern conception of moral freedom is unrestrained license, the opportunity to do what one wants without hindrance. However, unrestrained license in society creates a moral vacuum where individuals seek their fulfillment or pleasure without concern for consequences. And this moral vacuum causes societal vices such as reckless spending.

An individual who becomes enslaved to his moral vices often finds it difficult to deny himself anything on an economic level. If a person is unable to control his own spending habits and is addicted to gambling, pornography, or drugs, he will be less able to make prudent decisions regarding his financial welfare.

Individuals’ economic decisions do not occur in a vacuum: One person’s actions affect multiple individuals. If a man considers his gambling or drinking habits more important than providing for his family’s basic needs, then his family will likely be in economic peril. Similarly, if a woman consistently spends her money on frivolous items, her family could face economic ruin.

The same principle holds true in national matters –citizens and politicians who refuse to obey morality will ultimately destroy their country economically. The American culture is consumption-driven, creating an economy where people consume most of their wealth, often on frivolous items. The American savings rate (the percentage of disposable personal income that people save) is shockingly low by historical standards at 3.9%, and has been in near continuous decline since the 1980s.

The refusal of Americans to halt their own reckless consumption is reflected in excessive taxation and spending by their politicians.  The American government now faces trillions of dollars in debt because legislators fund countless programs and projects. To pander to their constituents, legislators even fight small budget cuts.

In the long run, only countries grounded in sound moral principles can economically survive and thrive. If America wishes to get back on a sound economic footing, Americans must promote a culture of virtue or, at the very least, discourage a culture of vice.

This post previously appeared on the New Agora.

Print Friendly
Paul Wilson About Paul Wilson

Paul Wilson is a media analyst at the Culture and Media Institute, who is also seeking his master’s degree in history at the Catholic University of America. You can follow him on Twitter at @PaulWilson34.

9 comments
Sort: Newest | Oldest
PaulWilson34
PaulWilson34

@FergHodgson I meant obedience to the natural and moral law (do good, avoid evil).

FergHodgson
FergHodgson

@PaulWilson34 Thanks for the clarification. If such law really is natural, then presumably people already are, at least to a large degree.

PaulWilson34
PaulWilson34

@FergHodgson That is true, to a large extent. But parts of natural law have been discarded or at least treated as irrelevant.

Fergus Hodgson
Fergus Hodgson like.author.displayName 1 Like

Hey Paul, you give plenty of food for thought, not that I agree with it all. I imagine you would appreciate this book by my uncle, The Good Rebel: Understanding Freedom and Morality. http://www.amazon.com/Good-Rebel-Understanding-Freedom-Morality/dp/0838638996

 

You rightly express concern that people can be slaves to their vices. The person who wants to run a marathon but can't keep from eating too much cake would be an example :) However, that does not negate governmental slavery. True freedom could well mean overcoming both impediments, external and internal, to living the life one wants.

Paul Wilson
Paul Wilson like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @Fergus Hodgson Thanks for your comment! From what you've said, however, I'm not sure where we disagree.

It is absolutely true that people can be slaves to government. The obvious instance is a totalitarian society, where government enforces a particular way of life, forbids religious faith, etc. 

But even in supposedly "democratic" governments, subtle instances of coercion can be where government contributes to and even creates a culture of dependency, such as extending the length of unemployment benefits ad infinitum. 

The point of my article was that a culture of virtue, in the long run, is necessary for freedom to flourish. External threats to freedom, i.e. government, are more obvious. But as you rightly point out, threats to freedom can be both internal and external.

I will happily check out The Good Rebel - looking it up now.